9 Lessons I Learned From Firing Someone

9 Lessons I Learned From Firing Someone As a boss, you will come across situations that require you to fire an employee. This could be as a result of the employee failing to meet their requirements at work, violating the company’s policies, or even due to reasons that are beyond the control of the employee, such as when the company decides to cut costs by letting some employees go. Regardless of the reason behind having to fire someone, or how justified the decision might be, firing someone is not a pleasant experience. Unless you are extremely inhuman, you are definitely going to feel bad about telling someone that you have decided to take away their job. You are basically pulling out the rug from under their feet. Maybe the person has a family to take care of, or a mortgage to pay, and you are taking the ability to do all that from him. Within the course of my career, I have had to fire employees a few times, and none of it was easy for me. However, I always try to learn something from every experience I go through, in cluding firing employees. Below are the 9 lessons I learned from firing someone. IT IS OKAY TO FEEL NERVOUSIt doesn’t matter how many times you have done it before, but you will always feel nervous before firing an employee. You are essentially dealing a huge blow to their life and their family. You are taking away their source of income and crushing their ego. In such a situation, it is normal that you will feel horrible. You might be unable to sleep the night before or unable to eat breakfast that morning. You will have a tight knot in your stomach. You should learn that all this is normal. Actually, if you find yourself not having the nerves when you are about to fire someone, it might be time for you to step down from the position. SOMETIMES FIRING IMPLIES A COMMUNICATION FAILUREUnless they commit a gross violation that requires their employment to be terminated immediately, employees should have an idea that their firing is imminent. If an employee gets shocked once you deliv er the news that they have been fired, this could be an indicator that you have a communication problem with your employees. As a boss or manager, it is your role to communicate with your employees and provide them with feedback to know how they are performing at work. If an employee does not know that they are underperforming, they will keep doing the same thing they are doing believing that they are doing what is required of them. Therefore, firing such an employee is technically your fault, because you are the one who is failing as a manager. To avoid such situations, create a habit of communicating with your staff and letting them know when they fall short of your expectations. Don’t wait for performance reviews to give feedback to your employees. Feedback â€" both positive and negative â€" should be given right away. It doesn’t have to be scheduled. Anytime you notice an employee slacking off or not meeting the requirements of the company, let them know immediately. Giving feedback immediately works well because the details and the context will be fresh in your mind and the employee’s mind, and they are more likely to take action to improve their performance. Feedback is so important that 72% of small business owners believe that employee appraisal is a valuable process.When giving feedback, avoid abstractions and vagueness. Be very specific. Telling an employee that they are underperforming is vague. Telling them that they have fallen short of their monthly sales target by 10% is specific. The idea here is to make sure that you are communicating well with your employees and giving them the best chance of succeeding at your job. If this is done properly, you are less likely to find yourself in situations that require you to let an employee go. LETTING THE EMPLOYEE GO IS NOT ALWAYS THE BEST DECISIONMost times, when it appears that an employee is underperforming, the default action is to show this employee the door. However, firing the employee is not your only option. If the employee is highly skilled but is underperforming, the problem could be that the employee is not in the best position for them. Instead of letting him go and going through the process of recruiting and onboarding a new employee, what if you could find another position where the employee can make better use of his skills? Sometimes, an employee’s underperformance comes from the frustration of not being able to apply their unique skills, not because they are not good employees. As a wise manager, reassigning such an employee is a better option than firing them since the company is already invested in the employee. In addition, such an employee already knows your company, they are loyal to the company and they do not need any time to get used to the company culture. Reassigning such an employee instead of firing them also helps improve overall morale and commitment to the company, leads to improved job performance and enhances a positive culture for the comp any. However, if you decide that it is absolutely necessary for the employee to be fired, keep these considerations in mind. FIRING AN EMPLOYEE WILL NOT SOLVE ALL YOUR PROBLEMSAn employee has been causing the company lots of trouble. He is not pulling his weight, projects are getting delayed and other employees are losing morale. You have tried talking to the employee and given him warnings but nothing you do seems to get him to improve. In such a situation, it is easy to assume that firing the errant employee will solve all your problems. However, firing the employee will not solve all these problems, at least not immediately. Instead, it might even create new problems. After firing the employee, you will need to sort out how his responsibilities will be covered by the remaining employees. As you might have guessed, the other employees won’t be very pleased with the extra work. In addition, you will have to deal with finding a replacement for the employee you just fired. Accordin g to SHRM, the cost of replacing an employee can be as high as 50% 60% of the employee’s annual salary. For highly skilled employees who earn high salaries, this cost can go as high as 200% of the employee’s annual salary. You will have to think about the resources that will be spent in advertising for the vacant position, working with recruiters to find suitable candidates, interviewing applicants, as well as onboarding and the initial training the new employee will have to go through before they can take on the duties of the previous employee. The aim here is not to urge you to keep a non-performing employee because of the inconvenience of finding a replacement for him. If you feel that an employee has to go, sometimes that is the best decision. However, before you let the employee go, think of all the things you will need to take of before you find someone to take over his duties. In addition, don’t expect that once the employee is gone that all the problems in the company will be over â€" productivity will go up, the morale of the other employees will improve, customer relationships will improve and so on. The workplace is a dynamic environment, and it is very unlikely that all the problems within the company are being caused by one employee. Therefore, don’t expect firing a non-performing employee to be a silver bullet that will solve all your problems. ALWAYS HAVE A WITNESS WITH YOU WHEN FIRING AN EMPLOYEEThe first time I had to fire someone, things did not go as I expected. The employee in question was someone I was friends with, and as you might guess, it wasn’t going to be easy for me. When she walked into my office, I started telling her that the decision to fire her had been made but I froze mid-sentence. I couldn’t go through with it. Luckily, I had the HR manager with me in the room. The HR manager realized that I was lost for words and went ahead and told the employee that the company had decided to terminate her employment. From tha t day, I have always made a point of having someone in my office when letting someone know that we are letting them go.Having a witness with you when firing an employee serves two purposes. In case you run out of words or if you are unsure what to say while communicating the decision like I did, the other person can pick up where you left and help you with the termination. In addition, you will be glad you had a witness in case the employee decides to take legal action against you. In today’s world where anyone can sue you anytime for any reason, someone who was with you in the room can back you up in court and confirm that you followed the right procedures when firing the employee and that you treated the employee fairly. The best person to have as a witness when firing someone is someone from HR. HR staff are usually well versed with firing employees and can help you communicate the decision directly and with finality, without letting it turn into an argument with the employee. Since HR staff are well versed with matters to do with fairness and professionalism when firing an employee, they will also make a more credible witness in case the matter goes to court. However, if you cannot get hold of an HR representative, you can find another person to act as a witness, such as someone senior to you in the organization, another manager on the same level as you, the company lawyer or a trusted employee. DON’T FORGET ABOUT THE REST OF THE TEAMWhen you fire an employee, you might be tempted to leave things at that and hope that everything will now start running smoothly. What most bosses forget is that the employee was part of a team, and that team will also be affected by the termination of their colleague’s employment. They might feel like they are next in line, and their morale might take a dip. To ensure everything continues running smoothly, you need to notify other colleagues about this new development. Maintaining silence about the firing of an employee might have several negative impacts for the company. If you do not address the issue, gossip will spring up within the office. The other employees might lose trust in the management of the company. They might also be worried that the firing of their colleague will mean a bigger workload for them. To avoid all this, take the time to rebuild the confidence of the remaining team. Simply tell them that the employee is no longer working with the company and reassure them that their jobs are not at risk. Reassure them that you appreciate the work they do for the company. Let them know that even though the next few weeks might be difficult, the company will take action swiftly to find a replacement for the employee who has been fired. Most importantly, avoid the urge to badmouth the employee who has just been fired. Doing so will only make the other employees lose respect for you. Below is a real life example of how you might break the news.“Yesterday was Paul’s last day with us, and we wish him all the best in his future endeavors. The company has already started the searching for someone who will take his place. In the meantime, Mike and Peggy will take over his duties. I appreciate the work all of you do here, and I want to assure you that none of your jobs is on the line. If anyone has any questions, please come talk with me in my office.”That should be enough to prevent any speculation and reassure the other members of the team.DON’T FORGET TO RESTRICT THE EMPLOYEE’S ACCESS TO THE ELECTRONIC SYSTEMSRegardless of the reason behind employment termination, whether the employee knew the termination was coming or not, no one will receive news of their sacking happily. Instead, they will feel betrayed. They will feel angry. They will feel bitter. In such emotional states, it is not uncommon for people to act irrationally. They will want revenge or anything that makes them feel like they are getting even. One of the easiest ways to do this is through the com pany’s electronic systems. An enraged employee who has just been fired might post insulting messages to other employees, mess with computer records or even steal confidential company data. To avoid this, you should coordinate with the IT department to ensure that the employee’s access to the company’s electronic systems is restricted. These include computer systems, company email accounts, customer contact forums, the company intranet, the company wiki, and so on. This should be done either slightly before you let the employee know about the decision to let them go, or during the termination meeting. Apart from disabling access to systems, you should also collect any company property such as laptops and access cards. IT IS HARDER FOR THEM THAN IT IS FOR YOUFiring employees has always been a hard thing for me. There is this one time I had to fire an employee who did not seem to be doing anything right. He was perpetually late and he rarely met his targets. However, he was a nic e guy, and everyone at the office liked him. However, after trying to get him to improve, it became clear that my only option was to let him go. When he appeared in my office for the termination meeting, I started by telling him how bad I felt about the decision to fire him. After letting him know that his employment was being terminated, I once again told him how sorry I was for him. Big mistake! He broke down, started pleading with me to reconsider the decision and making promises about how he would improve. This made the whole situation more emotional, and I almost changed my mind about letting him go. While firing someone feels hard for you, it is always harder for the person being fired. They just lost their source of income, so what you are feeling is nothing compared to what they are feeling. Trying to comfort them or apologize makes it even harder for them. After all, if you feel so bad about firing them, why are you doing it then? Trying to comfort them sends a message that the decision is up for debate, and the employee will almost always try to convince you why you should give them another chance. This is something you do not want since you have already decided that letting them go is the best decision. Therefore, you need to act as a strong, decisive boss. Remain calm and collected, and avoid showing your emotions. Apologizing is also an indicator that your decision might be wrong, which opens up the possibility of being sued.Pass the message with a degree of finality that lets them know that the decision is not up for debate. If the employee becomes emotional, give them time to let the news sink in, but do not try to give any excessive explanations. If you think that you will feel emotional while passing the news, it is a good idea to talk with your mentor beforehand and let him or her know how you feel. Having let off your emotions beforehand will make it easier for you to remain calm and collected while passing the news to the employee being fir ed. ALLOW YOURSELF TO FEEL GUILTYWhen an employee has been slacking on their job and pulling the whole team behind, the number one thing on your mind is usually to let the employee go. After making the decision and finally letting them go, it won’t take long before you start asking yourself if you did the right thing. Is there something else you could have done instead of firing him? Was he really a bad employee? Did you properly communicate to him what was expected of him by the company? Could you have somehow helped him improve his performance? Will his children get out of school because he now has no source of income?Asking yourself these questions after you fire someone from their job is normal. Don’t judge yourself too harshly because of this. You are only human, and it is normal to feel guilty when you just delivered such crushing news to someone, even worse when you are the one who made the decision. However, don’t dwell too much on these thoughts since they can affect your ability to perform your work in future, especially if you find yourself in a position where you have to fire another employee again. The best way to prevent this feeling of guilt is to ensure that you have anything within your ability to help the employee improve their performance, before resorting to letting them go. When you know that you tried to help to no avail, you are less likely to feel like you made the wrong decision. WRAPPING UPNo matter how many times you do it, firing an employee is never going to be a pleasant experience. You are cutting ties with someone who has been a part of your business and creating a hardship for them, and this will always be painful for both of you. Actually, firing someone should be only be used as a last resort. Before you let an employee go, you should do everything within your ability to try and get the employee to correct their behavior or improve their performance. However, sometimes letting the employee go is the best decision for th e company, and as a boss it is inevitable that you will find yourself having to make the call to fire someone. While the lessons shared in this article will not make it any pleasant, they will firing someone a little easier for you.

Egalitarian Relationships in Radical Heterosexuality Essay

In this article the author Naomi Wolf does a great job in explaining radical sexuality. Also known as egalitarian relationships. In marital relationships, the meaning is typically that husband and wife have equal status in the marriage. That is sometimes defined as having equal power. She talks about there being some conditions to abide by. For example, it requires that women should be able to support themselves without the help of any man. Also the man must yield the automatic benefits presented by gender. Women give up gender benefits as well as the men. By day they fight gender injustice; by night they sleep with men (Wolf p. 155), she questions weather feminists who are in a heterosexual relationship are contradicting themselves,†¦show more content†¦In conclusion, Wolf explains that it is perfectly ok to be a feminist, hate sexism and love men. Men were able to do just about anything they wanted with their wives, until the womens movement and even then in some parts of the countries it is still the same. Prior to the Civil War married women had many duties but few rights. They were not permitted to control their property, even when it was theirs by inheritance. A husband had the right to his wifes wages, to decide on the education and religion of their children, and to punish his wife if she displeased him. (Janice M. Steil). In addition, it shows how men always over rule women. Naomi Wolf also talks about how women were not treated as human. For example, she says, In the nineteenth century, when a judge ruled that a husband could not imprison and rape his wife, the London Times bemoaned. Also, she mentions the English common law that said, a man could legally beat his wife with a switch no thicker than his thumb, and thats where she says we got the phrase rule over thumb. It seems incredible to me that they treated women that way. What most feminists want is the marriage where their partner is showing respectful treatment towards them and their children, a kindness rather than a legal right such as before or in other countries today. Therefore, All the rules that men laid down over the centuries have recently gone out the window, and were

Robert Louis Stevensons Impact on British Literature

Robert Louis Stevenson ranks in the upper echelons of writers in British literature. He is one of the most popular writers of the nineteenth century. Stevenson had a great range of skill in producing works in the form of poetry, plays, short stories, essays and novels. A variety of aspects of his very own life and personal experiences were implemented into his literary works. The romance novel is that of which he is best became known for. His works are still studied and observed in today’s society. While he is not regarded as â€Å"the best† writer in British history, his work still demands respect and deserves appreciation. Robert Louis Stevenson was a talented literary artist that had a significant impact on British literature. Born†¦show more content†¦It was understood that while at the University of Edinburgh, Stevenson would be studying engineering. After his studies, Stevenson’s father hoped that he would begin his profession with the fami ly firm and follow in his father’s footsteps (The RLS Website). Stevenson, however, had a much more â€Å"romantic nature† within him, and while supposedly studying for a degree in science and engineering, he spent a majority of his time reading and studying French Literature, Scottish history, and the works of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer (Poem Hunter). In his twenty first year, Stevenson declared his intention of becoming a writer to his father, Thomas. He received strong opposition on the matter from his father, however (Encyclopedia of World Biography). Stevenson and his father then agreed to a certain type of compromise. His father would agree to accept his intentions to pursue a career as a writer, but would study for a career in law so that in the case that Stevenson’s career as a writer was a failure, he would at least have a profession to fall back on (Poem Saver). Stevenson was admitted to the Scottish bar in 1875 (Encyclopedia of World Biography). He â€Å"passed advocate† in 1875 but did not even bother to take time to practice because he had made it clear to himself that he wanted to be a writer by then. During the summer, on vacations from theShow MoreRelatedDr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A View Into Societal Changes in the 19th Century1398 Words   |  6 PagesRobert Louis Stevenson was born on November 13, 1850, in the city of Edinburgh, Scotland. Throughout his childhood he was told morbid tales from the Bible, as well as Victorian penny-serial novels that he would carry with him throughout his years and what would place the greatest impact on his writing.[1] In 1886, he published a novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, based on a man with pure intentions, who ends up turning himself into a viscous murderer. Dr. Henry Jekyll is a well-knownRead More Comparing the Impact of Darwin on Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and She1069 Words   |  5 PagesThe Impact of Darwin on Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and She Who Must Be Obeyed      Ã‚   Imagine what would happen if everything you believed to be true was suddenly challenged.   How would you feel if the solid rock bottom of your religious and cultural beliefs turned into a slippery slope of doubt?   Such was the dilemma the Victorians faced with the publication of Darwins Origin of the Species.      The questioning of mans origin in the form of evolution and survival of the fittest broughtRead MoreVictorian Novel9605 Words   |  39 Pagesshape and development. It was the novel that was the leading form of literature in the 19th century England. The term ‘novel’ itself was a simple narrative form, which in opposition to its forerunner, the ‘romance’ focused on the affairs of everyday life such as scientific discovery, religious debate, politics or colonial settlement. Though there are many arguments among critics which dates frame the period of Victorian literature, it is commonly accepted that it was the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901)Read MoreManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 Pagesthat were spent to create organizations that never earned a profit and were often hugely unsuccessful as business entities. However, this enormous cost to some companies also created beneficial impacts for many other companies in dealing with these fundamental wide-ranging issues. These beneficial impacts had an enormous effect in galvanizing fundamental business innovation in companies at a far faster rate than would have been the case if there had been no boom; that is, without those effects, innovation

Holocaust Sociology Free Essays

Gevorg Petrosyan Professor Wonser Intro to Sociology 23 June 2012 Final Project, Assignment 2: Nazi Germany and Holocaust The Holocaust was the genocide of around six million European Jews during World War II. (Holocaust History) Nazi Germany led by Adolf Hitler had targeted every single Jew to be perished. Unfortunately Nazi Germany succeeded to murder two-thirds of the nine million Jews who were stationed in Europe. We will write a custom essay sample on Holocaust Sociology or any similar topic only for you Order Now (Holocaust History) The Holocaust can be viewed at in many sociological perspectives of the sociologists mind. Adolf Hitler used everything in his power to exterminate any non-German ethnic that lived in Germany. Hitler) Authority played a key point in the Holocaust against the Jews. The following are the many perspectives of this horrific act against humanity. One of the main sociological perspectives that fall into Nazi Germany and how Holocaust was looked at was social stratification. The Aryan race was supreme; anybody else was lower then they. (Nazi SS) Jews, homosexuals, handicapped, prisoners of war, and minority groups were all prosecuted. As talked about in lecture, Max Weber’s theory of social class portrayed Adolf Hitler’s wealth, power, and prestige. Hitler used these components to his advantage and started an empire. Brainwashing Germans to hate and murder humans that are not in their â€Å"social class†, as said the Aryan race. Social class and inequality played a big role for the non-Aryan. Everything was stripped away from them such as cars, money, children, clothes, food, and eventually their hope. The people of culture of poverty had strong feeling of not belonging, helplessness, no faith, and all hope was gone. Jews and others were treated as aliens or non-humans. Adolf Hitler was a functionalist in my point of view because in that way he would think social stratification was both natural and beneficial to society. He promoted deviance in the way of the labeling theory. If you are not Aryan or German you are not welcome and also considered as a threat. (Nazi SS) In that case you are labeled through judgment and that changes the way others respond to you. Another labeling theory in the Holocaust was the yellow Star of David patch. This patch often put against right side of the chest, implemented and labeled the person as a â€Å"Jude†. Nazi persecutions used this to label to their prosecutors in an organized way. (Nazi SS) With this patch you had implanted in your mind that you are going to die. It was intended to be the badge of shame and now the public knew you as a Jew. The Jude community was treated like dogs; they were given a name and badge similar to dog tag or collar, and looked upon as animals. Erving Goffman’s term of stigma was given to the Jewish because of their social attribute. Nazi Germany used all three types of stigma in their society such as physical for the impaired or handicapped, moral for mentally challenged, and tribal for Jewish and other non-Aryan or German. The Erving Goffman’s term of stigma was lectured in class. Nazi Germany was big in-group created by Adolf Hitler. They felt loyalty and brotherhood towards each other. Anyone besides them was a major out-group, such as the Jews. The rivalry and hatred they had for the Jews was a usual thing by other fellow Nazi. Such a big in-group had and influence on any Nazi to believe what they were doing is right. Group cohesion strongly powered the Nazi for the loyalty and solidarity. All the members felt strongly tied to each other as family in a way. Any one else was not like them and was to be treated differently. Adolf Hitler’s social influence was the image to all Nazi. His social influence gave them their individual attitudes and behaviors towards others. This became ideal for a dictator, because the group norms made the members want to gain acceptance to their own country. Any negative sanctions were looked down upon and so Germans followed one after another into agreement. Weber’s idea of charismatic authority fell into the category of Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler served in the army and soon enough became known as the â€Å"Furher† of Germany. (Hitler 1) Hitler’s demanding voice and humorless speeches dominated audiences. He had all the qualities of a leader from the minute he was born. He didn’t like taking orders from his own strict father. (Hitler 1) Hitler also had many bureaucracies under him, such as the SS. The Schutzstaffel translated to Protection Squad was responsible for many of the crimes towards humanity during World War II. Heinrich Himmler was in charge of a vast bureaucratic empire. He was responsible for the SS, as well as the municipal police. (Nazi SS 4) The SS was feared amongst all Jews because of their deadly rules and punishments. These bureaucracies were so useful to the empire because they ran all the operations needed for power. Hitler used them to keep order and organization between the country, plus not to get his hands dirty. The Nazi Empire and Holocaust was made up of many total institutions. First one would be the military; Hitler knew he had to get the military on his side and soon will obey any command. Soon the military had a mortification of self in which they were brainwashed to dehumanize Jews. They were taught to have â€Å"racially pure† Germany and life. (Chronicle 2) The Holocaust wasn’t carried out by crazy or unusually violent people. The SS deliberately tried to ensure that those responsible for the actual killings were not especially eager, or emotional. They wanted the task to be as business-like and impersonal as possible. (Nazi SS 4) People stop worrying about what the ‘right’ thing to do is because the right thing is always to do what you’re told, and that was because of discipline and authority. Another total institution would be the death camps or also known as concentration camps. Which norms or laws were among the prisoners society? The prisoners had a whole new social life. Resocialization took an impact on them to which fighting for survival was needed and communications between prisoners and officers. Some type of achieved status controlled the whole environment of the prisoners and changed their outlook on life, which soon enough became a mortification of self. Prisoners under hunger, extreme working conditions, and terror of death mortified one to go toe extreme lengths of survival by obeying every rule given or going slowly insane to the point of no return. (Chronicle 2) One of the most disastrous theories for the Holocaust would be dehumanization. What people failed to realize why the Holocaust happened was because what the people were enabling each other to do. (Holocaust History 3) All they did was gather statistics and data and didn’t realize that it was human beings for those stats. The order is different from the act because the person who gave the order doesn’t interpret in their head what kind of order they just gave and the action part of it. The generals and Nazi didn’t focus on the fact that they were committing mass murder to a great amount of human beings with families and connections. There actions weren’t â€Å"bad† at the time so no problem in doing it but when later on in life they realize what they’ve done is very different outlook. The Holocaust would have been impossible without the advancements of modern society. The slaughtering of Jews and other was just like a factory but instead of producing goods, it was producing death. Without modern industrialization and technology they would have never killed mass amounts of people that fast. Gas chambers, trains importing prisoners, concentration camps, not much food source for prisoners, and workload were all components to modern society. Chronicle 3) This is what moved the genocide to speed up its movement of extermination. Letting Adolf Hitler get to his achieved status brought up to Holocaust idea. Without letting him get to this status of â€Å"Furher†. He would not turn a great country into a mass murdering empire of bureaucracies. His speeches, authority, leadership skills, and d iscipline is what made the Nazi Empire what it was. His authority and discipline is what made the soldiers make the choice they made. Why did Hitler target the Jews mostly? Why not another race? He blamed Jews for everything that happened within the country such as lost of World War I, and for the Great Depression. (Hitler 1) He also hated Jews because he regarded them as mostly Communist. (Hitler 1) Society killed the Jews because of their statuses and way of life. Jews were the most significantly affected by the Holocaust but others were targeted too. These included political opponents, soviet prisoners of war, communists, homosexuals, mentally challenged, non-Aryan, and gypsies. Holocaust History 3) They labeled it as â€Å"people that were killed in Holocaust† and didn’t seem to realize how it affected those peoples families and friendships. To this day Jews still mourn over the six million that died. Germany also takes in the guilt of what their country has done in the past. The Holocaust affected such large numbers and was one of the most mass killing genocides. It is taught all around the world in textbooks and classes. Society revo lves under it because now Jews are looked at differently even if they deny someone doesn’t. How to cite Holocaust Sociology, Essay examples

Plastic Surgery Essays - Plastic Surgery, Ancient Egyptian Medicine

Plastic Surgery Plastic Surgery People today are not satisfied with their physical appearance. Whether it is their weight, breasts, facial structure, or buttocks, there is always something they wish was different. As a result of this, many people turn to make-up or push-up bras. Some think that a different route is easier, plastic surgery. A study done by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons shows that, in 2011, 15 million people across the globe turned to plastic surgery to enhance their looks (Bates). Although many people turn to plastic surgery for better physical appearance, it is not the right decision a person wants to take. Plastic surgery costs a fortune and its an addiction, causes illnesses and possibly death, and it is a slow healing process. Plastic surgery deals with the repair, reconstruction, or replacement of physical defects of form or function involving the skin, musculoskeletal system, hand, extremities, breast and trunk, external genitalia or cosmetic enhancement of these areas of the body(Kita). It might look all too nice to get a plastic surgery done and changing the form or appearance of your body part for ever, its procedures usually cost a lot of money to get it done, so its not something that everyone can have, Its usage is limited to those belonging to the high echelons of the society. Furthermore, plastic surgery has the potential to become an addiction. Some people who undergo it become attracted with the outcome and look forward to a change in each and every part of their body. As such, plastic surgery becomes an obsession for them, rather than just a means of modifying a body part. When someone does unnecessary plastic surgery they begin to look abnormal which then leads to addiction. The case of 'revi sion' i.e. getting back the old look has become a common phenomenon in the present times. This is mainly because the result of the plastic surgery might not turn according to your desires. As a result, more and more patients are undergoing revision, after the surgery, to get back their original look. ...Some people suffer from a condition known as body dysmorphic disorder. Persons with this condition can be extremely good-looking, but view themselves as ugly. They equate happiness with beauty. Thus, to achieve a happy state, they undergo repeated cosmetic surgeries. Unfortunately, people with this disorder are never satisfied with their appearance(Higuera). Death can be caused by plastic surgery. There are many risks to be aware of like infection, nerve damage, scarring, and many more. Many celebrities have died from plastic surgery. Though rare, possibility of death cannot be ruled out during plastic surgery. The surgical process involves usage of chemicals and equipments that are not suitable for a persons body. Excessive bleeding, heart attack or even a drop in blood pressure, while the surgery is going on, are some of the things that might lead to death of the patient. All surgeries carry a risk of infection. In some cases, nerves may be damaged or severed during any surgical procedure. The result is more obvious, however, if it is a facial nerve. When those nerves are injured, the outcome can be the inability to make facial expressions or drooping of the eyes (ptosis) or mouth. Scarring is one of the greatest risks to achieving an attractive outcome, scarring is not always predictable, but can be controlled in most cases. Scarring is a possible disadvantage of plastic surgery. These scars are thick and red, they usually dont fade like most surgical scarring. Bruising and swelling for a period of time after the surgery are often difficult to hide, especially when the work was done on the face. A hematoma is a collection of blood outside of a blood vessel.it can develop after surgery, this typically results in an area being swollen and bruised in appearance, with a pocket of blood beneath. In some cases, this is minor, but a hematoma can be large enough to cause pain and even decrease blood flow through the area. In the case of a large hematoma, the surgeon may choose to remove some of the collected blood with a syringe or other similar method. The site of hematoma can present a firm

The Use of Tone in Man of La Mancha Essays

The Use of Tone in Man of La Mancha Essays The Use of Tone in Man of La Mancha Essay The Use of Tone in Man of La Mancha Essay In the play, Man of La Mancha, written by Dale Wasserman, a conglomeration of techniques is used to set or change the emotional feel of a scene. Lighting is lowered to create a sinister feel, or to show that that scene is in the prison, and sometimes it is increased in order to portray joy, or show that the scene is in the poet’s story. Musical crescendos and decrescendos are also used to show this. But even more important than these, are the tricks used by the actors themselves. Blocking, body language, and emotion are all very important, but one specific thing that I noticed was the tone of the performers. In the scene with the barber, the gypsy girl, and the â€Å"Golden Helmet of Mambrino†, the barber’s confusion and slight fear can be clearly heard, even through his minimal lines. Also, the profuse sincerity of Sancho Panza, not to mention his worry for his master, is clearly expressed in each and every of his scenes, especially the opening scene Cervantes’ tale and the final scene where Don Quixote dies after being reunited with his Dulcinea. Even while singing, (I Really Like Him) his tone and emotion remained consistent with the feel of the scene. The actor’s tone also remains constant to his character throughout the play, never becoming too brusque, or too insipid. Mainly though, the character with the most control over, and who had the best use of his tone, was Don Quixote. In the scene, for example, where Don Quixote is faced with the Knight of the Mirrors and his attendants, his cries of agony at the realization of his situation perfectly depicts the terror which is meant to accompany it. His sadness on his deathbed, his ecstatic joy in the recovery of his memories, and his humility when begging to be officially knighted, are all perfectly portrayed, primarily by the tones he uses to emphasize what he is saying. You can truly believe that he is dying, or remembering his love, or believes that the hotel is a fortress, and it’s landlord , a king. It takes many parts to make a play successful. The following of cues, memorization of lines, and the timing of special effects are all important. On a deeper level, the actor’s concentration, dedication, and skill levels are also crucial. A key part though, which can make or break the play, is the actor’s tone when he or she says her lines. With the incorrect tone, the scene feels wrong and the illusion of the play is broken. In this rendition of Man of La Mancha, the actors placed their tones perfectly, which successfully brought forth the underlying messages in the story, which are usually unintentionally omitted.

QA How and Why Should I Keep Track of Time on the SAT or ACT

QA How and Why Should I Keep Track of Time on the SAT or ACT SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips If you want to do well on the SAT or ACT, keeping track of time and how many questions you have left is extremely important. Sections are 35-60 minutes long on the ACT and 25-65 minutes long on the SAT. One of the leading reasons students perform poorly on either test is that they run out of time. And one of the leading reasons students run out of time is not because they're not aware of how much time is left. We'll go over the best way to keep track of time on the SAT/ACT in this article, including what timekeeping devices are and are not permitted on test day. Q: How Does Knowing How Much Time Is Left Help Me? Answer: It lets you plan out which questions to answer first. For each SAT/ACT section, most people agree that it's strategically best to start with the questions that are easy for you. You can then go back and answer the harder ones in an order that depends on how much time is left. If you have three hard questions and 15 minutes left, it probably doesn’t matter what order you do them in. On the other hand, if you only have five minutes left to do three hard questions, you should try to do the easiest-looking one first. But you can’t even make that choice if you have to rely on having a good view of the big clock on the wall or on the proctor's desk. Q: What Can I Bring to Time the Exam Sections? Answer: Not much. Unfortunately, neither test is very accommodating when it comes to timing devices. Both the SAT and the ACT have the following strict rules about what you can bring to the test. Rule 1: You Can't Bring a Cellphone This is for real. You are technically not even allowed to have a cellphone with you in the room, and you're certainly not allowed to look at your phone during the test or during the breaks in between sections. In practice, if you do take your cellphone with you to the testing center, you must make sure it is completely turned off. If you want to be really safe and know how to take the battery out of your phone, do it. Silent mode just isn't safe enough for the SAT or ACT. We say this because cellphones, even on Silent or Airplane mode, can beep or vibrate loudly for various reasons, from a national weather alarm alert to a software update that restarts the phone. And if your phone goes off, the test is over for you. Your test booklet will be confiscated and disqualified from being scored. More pertinently, even if you bring a cellphone with you to the testing center (which, again, is technically not allowed), you definitely, definitely can not use your cellphone, even just as a timer. Rule 2: You Can’t Bring Separate Timers The College Board explicitly lists "separate timers of any type" as something that cannot be brought in. This means no stopwatches, no kitchen timers, and no hourglasses. An hourglass is not an acceptable timekeeping device for the SAT or ACT. Rule 3: You Can't Bring Anything That Beeps If you use a beeping watch in a way that doesn't beep, it should be fine for the SAT/ACT. However, are you sure you won’t accidentally hit a button that makes it beep? Sure enough to bet your entire SAT or ACT score on it? The only way to guarantee your test won't get disqualified is to play it safe and just bring a watch that cannot make a beep. Q: What’s the Best Plan for Keeping Track of Time on the SAT/ACT? Answer: Use an analog (non-digital) watch that can’t beep but that you can easily reset. You can get a cheap non-digital watch for less than $15 on Amazon. If you’re not great at reading clocks, you can get an easy-to-read one that has the minutes marked on a ring around the watch face. Once you have your analog watch, practice using it as a timer with either of these two strategies. Strategy 1: Set Your Watch to Noon Right when each section starts, set your watch to 12:00 (so that the minute and hour hand are both on the 12). The minutes past 12:00 tell you how many minutes passed since the section started. It's an easier way to check how much time has passed than doing the mental math of, "So we started at 10:48, and it's 11:04 now, which means...16 minutes have passed? Probably?" The main problem with this method is that you still have to do some mental time math. For instance: "The 25-minute SAT Math No-Calculator section started at 12 pm and now it’s 12:07pm. How many minutes do I have left?" The answer is 18 minutes, but the time it took you to do the math in your head is lost time you could've been spending on the test. Save your math for the Math section and use this next trick. Strategy 2: Use Your Watch to Count Down to Noon An alternative to setting your watch exactly to noon is to set your watch to a section's length before the hour. For instance, if the section is 25 minutes long, set your watch to 35 minutes past the hour (which is 25 minutes until the next hour). The watch’s countdown to the end of the hour will also be a countdown to the end of the section. Here's a handy table with the times you should set your watch to at the beginning of each section: Section Length (minutes) Set your watch to... What sections are this length? 25 11:35 SAT Math (No Calc) 35 11:25 SAT Writing and Language, ACT Reading, ACT Science 40 11:20 ACT Essay (optional) 45 11:15 ACT English 50 11:10 SAT Essay (optional) 55 11:05 SAT Math (Calculator) 60 11:00* ACT Math 65 10:55* SAT Reading *To keep the countdown to noon consistent across all sections, it's better to use 11 and 10:55 here, but you could theoretically use a different time if you wanted. Setting your watch to count down to noon is helpful because: You effectively have a timer, giving you an edge. It's completely within policy, since you are allowed a non-beeping watch. It's better than doing time math. Of course, if you use this method, don't forget to reset the watch at the beginning of each section. And when the test is over and you’re out of the test room, set the watch back to the real time. What’s Next? Take advantage of your new knowledge of how to keep track of time by reading our tips on saving yourself time during the SAT. Still worried you'll run out of time? We have more great tips on how to avoid running out of time on SAT/ACT Reading and SAT/ACT Math. How long exactly are the SAT and ACT, anyway? Find out with our guides to how long (with breaks) the SAT and ACT are.